Telecom probably didn’t need another open RAN association, but it seems to have gained one anyway. In a low-key announcement, the Open RAN Policy Coalition introduced itself to the world today as the latest group advocating a more open approach to the construction of radio access networks. “Open” meaning no Huawei, of course.
For as the name implies, what really distinguishes this organization from its predecessors is the government’s interest in open RAN as an antidote to China’s 5G poison.
That’s not glaringly obvious until you read the part of the press release just above the membership details, where it says: “The US Federal Government has an important role to play in facilitating and fostering an open, diverse and secure supply chain.” And so on.
Supercharging smartphone connections with higher-speed technology is so passé. What really excites your visionary telco is the opportunity to sell 5G services to business customers. Besides, operators have already lost the consumer to the big beasts of tech. If there is any additional money to be made from 5G, it will have to be in the enterprise sector.
Unfortunately, operators are not doing a first-rate job of appealing to enterprise customers, according to new research carried out by analysts at Omdia, a sister company to Light Reading, and commissioned by BearingPoint Beyond, a consulting firm and developer of business support solutions.
As the aircraft crew prepared for takeoff one bright January morning early this year, the pilot, U.S. Air Force Capt. Adam Smith, had to be especially cognizant of the runway length and terrain surrounding Moffett Federal Airfield in Sunnyvale, California, south of San Francisco.
That’s true of any flight on the C-5, a colossal aircraft with a wingspan of over 222 feet that can lift more than a quarter of a million pounds and could have carried NASA’s Space Shuttle. But this was a particularly critical mission: Smith was shipping the final Advanced Extremely High Frequency (AEHF) satellite to Cape Canaveral, Florida, in the first-ever delivery of a space asset to the newly formed U.S. Space Force.
For the companies that are able, scrambling to support remote teams without losing momentum is a challenge in and of itself – especially for engineers who need to stay aligned throughout the product development process.
How do they adapt quickly to this new reality without jeopardizing quality, efficiency, or development timelines?
To define and design products successfully, communication among teams and stakeholders needs to go beyond basics of collaboration. It’s about more than just a conversation or simple text edit. Instead, it must be structured so it focuses on the product being built. It should include context to inform the conversations and decisions that are being made and provide broad visibility into the development process so change can be managed by each person responsible.
In the remote work dynamic, in-person meetings and face-to-face chats in the hallway no longer suffice when making decisions that impact an entire team and the product development process.
While tools like Zoom, Slack, and shared documents remain important in remote work, the communication demands for virtual engineering teams building complex products are more complicated.
Imagination Technologies’ now-defunct plan to add four Chinese investors to its executive board has touched a raw nerve in the UK and triggered a series of events leading to a full-blown government inquiry. In a three-hour hearing before the UK parliament’s foreign affairs committee, three Imagination CEOs, past and present, were grilled in a public battle to preserve the IP developer’s legacy.
The public debate centered around the suitability of Imagination owner Canyon Bridge Partners’ attempt a few weeks ago to add new Chinese directors to the board, and the government’s role — if any — in protecting home-grown intellectual property (IP).
After all, GPS was designed to enable navigation around the Earth, not in deep space. Space vehicles operating beyond the reaches of GPS have to rely on other methods for determining their position, navigation, and timing, such as inertial measurements or even star tracking.
Those methods vary in reliability, so the Department of Defense is looking for a more accurate tool — namely, a quantum space sensor.
Most touchscreen panels have a limited type of haptic feedback or none at all. This is also true for many types of handheld or wearable devices like watches, touchpads, keyboards, a mouse, etc. The desire for improved haptic feedback is leading some to take a closer look at piezo transducers to generate haptic signals, which provide a number of physical and electrical improvements over traditional vibration generators.
This article reviews piezo transducer principles, theory, and modelling. It includes a discussion of electronic circuits that are specifically designed to drive the unique characteristics of piezo transducers and shares examples of haptic applications using piezoelectric transducers.
Earth-observation analytics can be used to provide satellite-based insights to address societal needs such as food sustainability, monitoring climate change, deforestation, disaster management, smart cities, imaging to locate natural resources such as oil and gas, as well as continuous, real-time monitoring of critical assets in remote areas. The latest predictions for this market are valued at $8 billion by 2026.
To exploit the lucrative market opportunity, industry and governments are looking for more and more applications that would benefit from space technology, while operators are trying to differentiate by offering better services, like ultra-high-resolution streaming video.
Real-time video or acquiring higher-resolution images impacts on-board mass memory requirements.